<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buckley's Mix &#187; Washington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buckleysmix.com/tag/washington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buckleysmix.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Science Studies at the Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://buckleysmix.com/2009/02/13/science-studies-at-the-washington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://buckleysmix.com/2009/02/13/science-studies-at-the-washington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank Buckley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics as mental Illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckleysmix.com/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am at a disadvantage with other bloggers because I don&#8217;t take that rich source of nuttiness, the New York Times. However, the Washington Post occasionally rewards its readers with an unconsciously ridiculous story. Today it was a WaPo page one account of a battle over vaccines and autism, and the connection or absence thereof between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am at a disadvantage with other bloggers because I don&#8217;t take that rich source of nuttiness, the <em>New York Times</em>. However, the <em>Washington Post</em> occasionally rewards its readers with an unconsciously ridiculous story.</p>
<p>Today it was a WaPo <a href="http://buckleysmix.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&amp;post=418">page one account </a>of a battle over vaccines and autism, and the connection or absence thereof between them. On the one side, a consensus of the medical establishment, nearly 1,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies, the AMA, and a federal judge. On the other side, angry parents, their trial lawyers, Robert F. Kennedy and Rolling Stone magazine.</p>
<p>Two sides. Who can say who is right? Not the Post. &#8220;it remains to be seen whether yesterday&#8217;s ruling will end the controversy&#8211;or be seen as just more evidence of what some call a conspiracy.&#8221;</p>
<p>If there really are two sides to every science story, should creationists be cut some slack?</p>
<p>I recognize, of course, that newspapers writers are not supposed to editorialize. But in describing conspiracy theories as a matter of serious debate, a story may legitimize the illegitimate. We should care what Robert F. Kennedy thinks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buckleysmix.com/2009/02/13/science-studies-at-the-washington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

